Saturday, 18 January 2014

Part 4: Listening Log



Bach’s Prelude & Fugue No.2 in C minor  - BWV 847 – recording found on Spotify (1722)

This piece is a good demonstration of the style of counterpoint, allowing the bass and treble rhythms to work against each other.  However, despite this ‘freedom’ of movement, both clefs seem to in tonal harmony, demonstrating Bach’s talents.

The effect gained from this type of melodic movement is a very busy, and slightly overpowering feeling.  The tempo of this piece is reasonably fast, which although demonstrating the player’s ability, does have a tendency to allow the rhythms to merge at points, making it very difficult to follow each melodic line. 


Johann Christian Bach’s Keyboard Sonata Op.17 No.1 in Gmajor (1774) – recording found on Spotify

Although in some ways there is much more of a virtuoso style of J.C. Bach’s composition that his father’s work, it is clear to see that J.C. Bach had adopted a simpler style of composition, allow one melodic line to shine out. 

Much like my studies have so far have revealed, this piece contains a large amount of repetition of musical themes.   To me it seems that the treble clef (right hand) demonstrated the virtuoso style and introduced the musical motifs.  The bass clef (left hand) then becomes the accompanist; echoing the musical themes and adding simple chord and simple note accents. 

Whilst this piece remains wholly in G major throughout, with a number of repeating sections, I found this composition to be slight boring towards the end, as there seems to be no sense of growing, developing and moving. 

Beethoven Symphony No.1 in C major (1801) – recording found on Spotify

This piece is not only an excellent representation of the Symphony format during the Classical period, but it also demonstrates Beethoven’s growing romantic ideas and strong ideas of heroism.  Following the original published score, whilst a little difficult at times, proved an extremely useful tool in helping to spot things such as ternary form, etc.

The first movement of Beethoven’s first Symphony carries a slight wispy, gentle and soothing feel, mixed with elements of anticipation and melodic growth.  There were a number of musical ideas presented during this section, each given the ability to take on slightly different personas due to shifting moods and sounds.    It was interesting that given the key of this piece remains entirely in C major, Beethoven has interspersed a number of the same melodic motions, but altered the key by the use of accidentals. 

As was traditional for the Symphony, the second movement carries a more lyrical and expressive feel.  It was during this section that I was reminded of some of Beethoven’s later Romantic works.  His use of drama and rapidly changes feeling of hope and grandeur were clearly the beginnings of Beethoven’s passion for heroism. 

Although the third section is entitles a ‘minuet’, it actually is more similar to a faster movement of a Scherzo.  Once again, the sense of trepidation and tension which is scored during this section reminded me more of later more narrative works scored for ballets.  However, it was the final section that provided me with the most intrigue.  Written with a series of repetitive themes, interspersed with new musical ideas, created a great crescendo to the whole piece.  Much like the psychology applied to the Sonata form, I would imagine that this closing section would have been a further opportunity for the composer to demonstrate his compositional range and ability.   


Haydn’s String Quartet No.1 in B flat Major Op.1 (1762 - 1764) – recording found on Spotify

Written in 5 parts, Haydn’s string quartet varies slightly from the common 4-part form during this piece.  The opening section provides quite a regular melodic and rhythmic motion across the quartet, each closely tonally tied in interval.  There was quite a range of dynamics in this section, yet it carried quite a constant and steady bright and light feeling.  However, moments of slight tension and dissonance were present towards the end. 

The second part however, seemed to vary more in its themes.  Based on a minuet rhythm, this piece was much slower than Beethoven’s interpretation above, giving it a more classical dance feel.  I noticed a greater sense of homophony at the beginning of the piece, with the first violin taking precedence over the other instruments.  This was interrupted by a section of rising tension which heavily relies on the use of both silence and the ‘plucking’ of the strings to give a staccato effect.    Toward the end of this section we seemed to return to the earlier motifs suggesting a hint of A-B-A ternary form. 

The third section begins with a sense of melancholy, but ‘opens out’ later in the piece to reveal, once again, a homophonic nature.  Whilst in the last piece Haydn has scored tremolos, possibly for a sustain effect, in this piece, the tremolos seem much more ornamental.    The fourth second provides a second minuet, which carries a number of similarities to the second movement.  However, this time the instruments seem to be ‘blending’ more, with less of a sense of the first violin taking centre stage. 

The final ‘Presto’ section, provides the audience with one last slice of ‘drama’ and possibility virtuosity on the player’s part.    Throughout this section I could clearly hear a number of the themes which have appeared earlier in the composition.

Mozart’s Piano Concerto No 21 (1785) – recording found on Spotify

This piece blends the strings, woodwind, brass and percussion sections seamlessly to provide a great backdrop for a virtuoso pianist to ‘showcase’ their talents.  The opening section begins with a ‘march’ feel, with the violin taking precedence over the other instruments.   It isn’t until around 2 minutes into this section that piano actually reveals itself as the main instrument.  However, at this point, and continuing on, the piano gives a highly skilled and very virtuosic performance.  I found it interesting that at times the instruments seems to ‘take turns’ in accompanying the piano, before all coming together to create increasing tension and drama.  Towards the end of the first movement there is a very elaborate cadenza, before a brief reiteration of the primary theme of the movement. 

Moving to F major, the 2nd movement, Andante, has much slower, lyrical and dream-like qualities.  Much like the first movement, the piano doesn’t appear until later in this piece, and this time it gives a much more simple melody, ornamented with trills and gently accompanied by the orchestra.  However, this movement seems to introduce a number of new musical ideas and directions, leading us to a more tense and ominous feeling at times. 

The final movement contains more of the virtuoso piano style, but this time the orchestra seem to be more closely linked to the melody, as opposed to the piano taking the lead.  This section contains a number of repeating sections, interspersed with new musical ideas and thoughts. 

Beethoven Piano Sonata No. 14 in C sharp minor (1801)

Notes of this piece can be found in the main body of my blog under Exercise: Enjoying Classical Music.

Haydn – London Symphony No. 97 in C major: Adagio - Vivace (1792) – recording found on Spotify

This piece demonstrates Haydn’s growing musical style during his visits to London with Saloman.  The blend of instrumentation during this composition adds a rich texture and varying emotions, which reflect Haydn’s ever-developing style. 

The opening movement begins very gently with a homophonic style lead by the first violin.  An underpinning oscillation of the other instruments, teamed by contrasting moments of drama, builds an ebb and flow of anticipation and slight tension.  As the piece develops, the woodwind echo the strings before the orchestra ‘bursts’ into a joyous and regal feel.  At this time there are very distinct patterns of repetition, each building slightly in grandeur each time.

This movement continues to offer dramatic contrast in mood and dynamics, later giving moments of great tension, sadness and hope.  I also thought that I could detect some folk tones, perhaps echoing Britain’s historical folk traditions. 

Although I may find it hard to describe how this piece is very British in nature, as a Briton it instills a certain feeling of patriotism and somehow ‘sums up’ many of our traditional and historical ideals. 

Haydn – Keyboard Concerto in D Major (1780 - 83) – recording found on Spotify

The first movement, Vivace, provides quite a simple composition, heavily built on a homophonic nature, seemingly largely favouring the piano’s treble clef.   Throughout the composition the piano provides both gentle and simple solos, large emotional sections backed by the orchestra, and more complicated virtuoso sections.   The blend of these techniques in the first movement provides an overwhelming feeling of joy, happiness and perhaps innocence. 

I feel that the second movement holds a greater reflection to the earlier music of the Baroque period.  The blend of instruments, favouring the violin at points, seems to give the piano a slight ‘break’ from its solo duties and familiar 17th century motifs become apparent.  However, moments of the piano providing a more lyrical feeling are interlaced, reminding us that this is a keyboard concerto. 

Whilst possibly still carrying a Baroque feel, the closing section demonstrates a more virtuosic style of piano playing with fast, complicated arpeggio sections and gentle melodic movements.    In a homophonic style, the instruments of the orchestra offer a very gentle and quiet accompaniment, intercepted by large dramatic burst that help to build the tension.    Toward the end of the piece, I ffelt it became quite frantic and hectic as it builds towards a great moment.  The composition closes with a crescendo, which in my opinion doesn’t quite ‘live up’ to the tension built throughout. 

Mozart – Serenade for Winds No. 11 in E Flat Major (1781) – recording found on Spotify

I must admit, I found this composition extremely boring.  Although I can appreciate that a serenade is based around a central theme of love, throughout the five movements of this piece I found the ‘movement’ of the music to be very flat and monotone, adopting very little emotional range.  

Whilst it may not be to my taste, I can however appreciate that throughout this composition Mozart has adopted techniques of both polyphony and homophony.   Much like compositions appearing in the 19th century, repetition also played a key role in this piece. However unlike these later compositions, I found the repetition more a deterrent to listening as opposed to a familiar ‘home point’. 

Mozart Symphony No. 6 in F major II: Andante (1767) – recording found on Spotify

Composed by an eleven-year old Mozart, this symphony is an excellent example of his natural gift for music.  Written for 2 flutes, 2 oboes, bassoon and strings, the second movement of this piece offers a range of emotion and melodic movement.

This movement begins with the instruments growing in volume, repeating and developing a light, gentle and hopeful melodic flow.  The overlapping of the instruments creates both a homophonic and polyphonic feel at times, and the gentle oscillations of the violins which appear later lead the way to a more dramatic and tense central section.  At this time, the violin leads and the other instruments provide a harmonic backing.   This section seems to carry a very lyrical feel that grows and adopts feelings of joy and excitement.  In symphonic style, the second movement returns to the original ideas heard at the beginning.

Muzio Clementi – Keyboard Sonata in B flat major Op. 24 (1788) – recording found on Spotify

The opening section of this piece provides a number of musical themes and ideas in the usual sonata ‘exposition’ style.  However, unlike other sonatas I have listened to, I found it more difficult to specifically decipher to the movements of a clear first and second musical theme.  Instead, the themes seem to be mixed together from the beginning, intertwining and developing throughout.    However, despite not seeing a clear ‘line’ of change, this section takes the motifs through a range of emotions and feelings from innocence and joy to tension and dark drama. 

Given the varied development of the motifs in the first section, it was interesting to hear how Clementi had changed the mood completely at the beginning of this section, portraying sadness and depression.  As the piece develops we are given a slightly brighter outlook as the melodic movement speeds up and gives a more playful feel on the treble clef.  However, the contrasting deep notes from the bottom of the piano’s range underpin this playful side. 

The third section adopts a more virtuoso style, with the bass clef offering a dramatic accompaniment to the complexity of its treble counterpart.  The feeling of light ‘skipping’ movements contrasted with deep, dark and slightly dissonant chords from the bass give the entire section an unstable feeling.  However, this seems to balance out in the latter half of the closing section, although this time recalling the earlier motifs clearly in a bright, yet tense manner. 

The ending of the piece lacks the drama that one might expect from a sonata of this complex harmonic nature.  Although the closing section provides a growing feeling of anxiety, building together the original motifs, it closes very quickly with a short cadence based on the triple repetition of a single bass chord. 

Johann Stamitz – Clarinet Concerto in B flat major (1755) – recording found on Spotify

Although I would consider myself to have a good appreciation of classical music, I will admit that at times I find it difficult to listen to entire pieces in one sitting.  However, perhaps due to the blend of instrumentation or musical emotion, I found Stamitz’s Clarinet Concerto to be an extremely enjoyable piece to listen to throughout. 

As is typical with a concerto, the first movement provides an introduction to a number of musical themes, broken with a cadenza.  From the beginning the mood carries a light, bright and hopeful feel, with the orchestra supporting the clarinet throughout.   Although I would consider this piece to be mainly homophonic in nature, the rich blend of harmonic layers provided by the orchestra gives a sense of depth and complexity.  I found the cadenza in this section to be quite unusual, as it initially provided a darker and more tense feeling, eventually erupting back into the original theme.   However, it is perhaps this contrast that provides yet another opportunity to hold my attention throughout the composition. 

The second movement gives a more lyrical melodic movement and more obvious sense of homophony.  Set to an adagio tempo, the slower pace gives the clarinet a more virtuoso styling and the gently changing harmonies and subtle dynamic changes create a constant ‘flow’ throughout.  Despite picking up on moments of tension provided by the string section, the clarinet’s slightly muted and melancholic tones help to balance out the mood of the second movement to provide a more ‘contented’ feeling. 

The closing movement of this piece adopts a faster tempo again and is greatly reminiscent of the themes explored in the opening section.  Seemingly written using Rondo form (repeating sections interspersed with new material), this acts as another aid to holding the focus of the audience by providing familiar, possibly slight augmented material.    At the close of the piece we return to the home key of B flat major to provide an overarching feeling of resolution. 


Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment vs.  Royal Philharmonic Orchestra playing Beethoven’s Violin Concerto in E minor Op. 64 (1807) – recordings found of Spotify

Whilst both of these pieces provided exactly the same musical composition, I was surprised to see how wildly they different in terms of mood.  The Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment’s (OAE) version provided what I would consider to be the most authentic version in terms of the original performances; I would imagine that the more modern version would have more accurately matched Beethoven’s initial ideas. 

I think this is mainly be due to the clarity of the instruments that varies widely between pieces.  In the OAE’s performance, the instruments seemed somehow muted, dulled and lacked a sense of precision.  Of course the lead violin stood out clearly from the other instruments, but the orchestra’s ‘support’ seemed to merge and blend together lacking instrument distinction.  However, the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra’s (RPO) performance allowed me to pick up on each instruments movement with extreme clarity.

Despite my preference for the RPO’s performance of this piece, I cannot help but in many ways favour the ‘merging affect’ of the OAE’s orchestra backing.  As a concerto, to me the only instrument that should ‘stand out’ is the violin; therefore perhaps the more amalgamated sounds of the traditional instruments provides a more truthful representation of the 18th ideals. 

Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach – Viola da Gamba Sonata in G minor Wq. 88: II: Larghetto (1737) – performed by Florilegium and Rebeka Ruso & Sebastian Wienand  - recordings found Spotify

This comparison of a traditional vs. modern orchestra gave an even greater contrast than the OAE and RPO (see above).   However, this time the main difference was provided by the substitution of the harpsichord for the piano.  The Florilegium version demonstrates the sharp and staccato tones of the harpsichord and delivers a more rigid feeling to the piece.  However, the piano’s flowing sound and sustain provides a lighter and gentler accent to the strings. 

It would be difficult for me to identify which version I prefer, as they each hold such different properties.  Whilst in many ways the ‘dated’ feel of the Florilegium’s performances makes it harder for me to relate to the piece, it does provide a much more accurate representation of the Classical era. 

A comparative study of Mozart’s Marriage of Figaro (1786) & Handel’s Julius Caesar (1724) – recordings found on Spotify

Finding operatic listening very hard, this exercise was quite challenging for me – possibly due to my lack of interest in this genre.  However, when listening to these pieces, I was able to detect a distinct difference in mood between the two genres. 

Despite reading a brief synopsis of both operas, my lack of experience in this genre along with my monolingualism, meant that I was unable to follow the story unfolding.  However, I was able to distinguish between aria and recitative sections and learn of cavatinas (short song of simple character), coros (addition of choir), duettinos (emotionally concise duet) and terzettos (three characters coming together).

In terms of distinguishing between Opera-buffa (comic) and Opera-seria (Grand), my lack of experience made quite difficult for me to find specific differences that I can elaborate upon.  However, as a generalisation, I found the Marriage of Figaro to carry a slight ‘over the top’ feel in terms of the libretto.  At points during the composition, mainly during the aria section, the power and range demonstrated by the singers provides a slight feeling of ‘mocking’ of traditional opera style.  However, Handel’s opera provided a much more serious, musically ‘perfect’ performance, heavily respecting the vocalist’s range.    


References & Bibliography for Part 4


References for Assignment Four

Carpenter, A (n.d.). Symphony No.1 in D Major, Op.24 - Sergey Prokofiev [online]. Available from: <http://www.allmusic.com/composition/symphony-no-1-in-d-major-classical-op-25-mc0002366554>. [Accessed 14th January 2014].

Hoffer, C (2010). Music Listening Today. Boston, USA: Schrimer Cengage Learning.

Huscher, P (n.d.). Chicago Symphony Orchestra: Program Notes: Pulcinella [online]. Available from: <http://cso.org/uploadedFiles/1_Tickets_and_Events/Program_Notes/ProgramNotes_Stravinsky_Pulcinella.pdf>. [Accessed 14th January 2014].

Kovacs, T (2013). Sergei Prokofiev: Symphony No.1 in D major Op.25 [online]. Available from: <http://tiboresque.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/prokofiev-symphony-no-1-in-d-major-op-25-classical-symphony/>. [Accessed 14th January 2014].

Lindsay, C (2011). The Leading Tone: Mannheim Rocket [online]. Available from: <http://leadingtone.tumblr.com/post/10519845582/mannheim-rocket-refers-in-the-classical-period>. [Accessed 14th January 2014].

Messing, S. (1996). Neoclassicism in Music: From the Genesis of the Concept through the Schoenberg/Stravinsky Polemic. 1st. ed. New York, USA: University of Rochester Press.

O'Rourke-Jones, R & Summers, D(eds). (2013). Music: The Definitive Visual History. London, UK: Dorling-Kindersley London.

Violin Online: Study 5 – 20th Century Music [online]. (n.d.). Available from: <http://www.violinonline.com/unit5_3.html>. [Accessed 13th January 2014].
Wolfgang-Amadeus.at: Biography of Mozart [online]. (n.d.). Available from: <http://www.wolfgang-amadeus.at/en/biography_of_Mozart.php>. [Accessed 5th January 2014].

Bibliography & References for Part Four

Asociatción Luigi Boccherini (2013). Luigi Boccherini: The Culmination of Classical Music in Southern Europe [online]. Available from: <http://www.luigi-boccherini.org/en/biografia.php>. [Accessed 8th January 2014].

Bach Canatatas (n.d.). Carl Philipp Emanuel Back - Short Biography [online]. Available from: <http://www.bach-cantatas.com/Lib/Bach-Carl-Philipp-Emanuel.htm>. [Accessed 8th January 2014].

Bauman, T (1994). The Oxford Illustrated History of Opera. 1st. ed. London, UK: Oxford University Press.

Biography.com (2011). Franz Joseph Haydn Biography [online].  Avaliable from: < http://www.biography.com/people/franz-joseph-haydn-9332156>. [Accessed 3rd January 2014].

Floricor Editions: History of Harmoniemusik [online]. (n.d.). Available from: <http://www.floricor-editions.com/index.php/harmoniemusik>. [Accessed 10th January 2014].

Melograni, P. (2007). Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: A Biography.  Chicago, USA: Chicago Press Ltd.

Naxos: The History of Classical Music [online]. (n.d.). Available from: <http://www.naxos.com/education/brief_history.asp>. [Accessed 30th December 2013].

Orchestra of the Age of Enlightenment: Johann Peter Saloman [online]. (n.d.). Available from: <http://www.oae.co.uk/people/johann-peter-salomon-1745–1815/>. [Accessed 9th January 2014].

Parry, M (ed). (2003). The Houghton Mifflin Dictionary of Biography. 6th ed.. Boston, USA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Prone to Violin: Johann Stamitz [online]. (2012). Available from: <http://pronetoviolins.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/johann-stamitz.html>. [Accessed 9th January 2014].

Raptus (1998). A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE STRING QUARTET UP TO BEETHOVEN [online]. Available from: <http://www.raptusassociation.org/stringprehist_e.html>. [Accessed 3rd January 2013].

Rasch, R. (2005). Music Publishing in Europe 1600 - 1900: Concepts and Issues Bibliography. Berlin, Germany: BWV.

Rorke, M,A (2001). Music Therapy in the Age of Enlightenment. PhD thesis, University of Utah.

Royal Philharmonic Society [online]. (n.d.). Available from: <http://royalphilharmonicsociety.org.uk/index.php/awards/salomon/johann_peter_salomon/>. [Accessed 9th January 2014].

Samson, J (ed). (2001). The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Music. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sherrane, R (n.d.). Music History 102: The Classical Period: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart [online]. Available from: <http://www.ipl.org/div/mushist/clas/mozart.html>. [Accessed 5th January 2014].

Sisman, E (n.d.). Sonic Glossary: Homophony [online]. Available from: <http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/sonicg/terms/homophony.html>. [Accessed 1st January 2014].

Smith, T. (1996).  Stamitz, Johann Wenzel Anton: Biography [online].  Avaliable from: < http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/tas3/stamitz.html>. [Acceseed 8th January 2014].

Summerer, E M (2006). Franz Joseph Haydn. New York, USA: The Rosen Publishing Group Inc..

Szczepanski, K (2008). Classical Music: Introduction to the first Viennese School [online]. Available from: <http://www.entertainmentscene360.com/index.php/classical-music-introduction-to-the-first-viennese-school-32319/>. [Accessed 10th January
2014].

Thinkquest: Characteristics if the Classical Period [online]. (n.d.). Available from: <http://library.thinkquest.org/27927/Classical_characteristics.htm>. [Accessed 1st January 2014].

Thuleen, N (n.d.). Serious and Comic Opera in Eighteenth Century Italy [online]. Available from: <http://www.nthuleen.com/papers/M52opera.html>. [Accessed 10th January 2014].

Tucker, D (1996). Muzio Clementi. 1st. ed. USA: Belwin-Mills Publishing Corp..

Victoria and Albert Museum: The 18th Century Opera [online]. (n.d.). Available from: <http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/0-9/18th-century-opera/>. [Accessed 11th January 2014].


Reflective Commentary for Part Four



Despite my initial reservations about the Classical period, this section of the course has largely proved to be the most interesting section so far.  The Manheim and Vienna ‘schools’ of music provided a great time of musical change, both in their style and audiences.  The break away from Patronage seemed to provide composers such as Mozart with the freedom and inspiration to begin composing pieces for the masses, containing more emotion and drama than pieces composed during the preceding era.   

The development of forms such as the sonata and symphony was possibly the beginning of providing a psychological perspective to the performance of music ensuring audiences were captured by their meticulously designed and ‘enlightened’ works.    In addition, the study of the structure of these forms helped me to gain a better ear for the pieces, enabling me to pick out significant features of the works I was listening to. 

My study of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No.14 in C sharp major (1801) provided me with the opportunity to study a piece of music which has always been a favourite of mine.  It helped me to not only further enjoy the piece having gained more knowledge of its history, but also enabled me deconstruct the techniques of the composer.

Research into Haydn, Mozart, Clementi, and other composers of the time lead me to further understand their desire to revisit the classical style of simplicity.  It seems that it was in the pursuit of this that a great deal of homophony was used in compositions, underpinned by harmony giving dramatic and narrative elements.

However, it was perhaps the section of the classical opera that provided the biggest surprise for me.  Having stated clearly that I am not a fan of opera, I actually thoroughly enjoyed, and now feel a greater appreciation for, the form.    A study of pieces in both the opera-buffa and opera-seria genres, such a Mozart’s The Marriage of Figaro, I was able to gain a much deeper understanding of the ‘message’ of the composers.  The exercise of writing programme notes for Gluck’s Orfeo ed Euridice also helped me understand the simplicity of opera and the techniques put in place for a narrative ability. 

My final assignment comparing the works of Stravinsky’s Pulcinella and Prokofiev’s Symphony No.1 with the techniques of classical composers gave me the chance to apply my listening skills to some extremely well crafted pieces.  I was able identify numerous features between the two eras, and the composers’ contrasting styles presented two very different methodologies.  In addition, this assignment lead me to question links between modern and classical techniques in terms of psychology and appealing to wide audiences. 

As earlier mentioned, I found this section very enjoyable.  However, I must admit to finding it extremely tricky to follow the scores of some of the larger compositions.  Whilst I would consider myself quite competent at reading scores of up to 4 lines, when 12 or more were involved, with changing rhythmic structures, I became quite lost at times!  However, it did find the exercise beneficial as I was able to access the scores for both Pulcinella and Symphony No. 1 which aided me in identifying prominent classical features.  

Assignment 4: Classical Influences on 20th Century Compositions


Classical Influences on 20th Century Compositions of Pulcinella & Symphony No. 1

In the early twentieth century, a new musical direction emerged known as neo-ClassicismThis period saw a revival of the traditional compositional styles, born during the classical period of the 1700s.  In a desire to break away from the dominating romantic trends pre-World War I, artists such as Igor Stravinsky and Sergei Prokofiev began resurrecting the traditions of the Manheim and Vienna schools of music; following in the footsteps of composers such as Haydn and Mozart (Hoffer 2010).   The aim of this essay is to compare influences of the Classical period on 20th century compositions: Igor Stravinsky’s Pulcinella (1920) and Sergei Prokofiev’s Symphony No. 1 (1917).

Neo-Classicism sought to remove some of the complexities of the romantic, nineteenth century pieces, including reducing the overall length of compositions and restoring a more simplistic and homophonic nature (Messing: 1996).  Igor Stravinsky’s Pulcinella provides an excellent example of the fusion of these two compositional styles that occurred during the neo-Classic movement.

Composed as a ballet with only a single act, the musical form of Pulcinella goes against the rigidity of 18th century forms such as the 4-part Symphony, the sonata and the concerto.   However, this modern twist is directly contrasted by the narrative compositional style, adopting a distinct theme of classical Neapolitan literature.

With melodic development telling a story of love, jealousy, grief and joy, Pulcinella demonstrates a number of other features that could be attributed to the neo-Classic revival.  Firstly, Stravinsky composed the ballet for a small chamber orchestra of just 33 players, contradicting the large orchestration of the nineteenth and early twentieth century such as Mahler’s Symphony No.8, dubbed the ‘Symphony of a Thousand’.  However, arguably the most notable classical influence on Stravinsky’s work comes in the thematic inspiration of the ballet itself.  Violin Online (n.d.) write that when commissioned, Stravinsky was asked to ‘re-invent’ compositions of the 18th century, adding new material to create a ‘patchwork’ of new and old.   One such example is Stravinsky’s Pulcinella Overture, which takes themes from violinist Dominico Gallo’s Sonata No. 1 in G (1780).  When listening the two pieces side-by-side, the many similarities in melodic movement of both pieces could be heard clearly. However, Stravinsky’s lack of the continuo part, provided by the harpsichord in Gallo’s version, gives a distinct ‘modernised’ and more simplistic feel. 

Whilst listening to Pulcinella, I noticed a number of stylistic elements that contrast both classical and modern techniques.   In my opinion, Stravinsky seems to adopt a very homophonic approach, providing simple harmonies, underpinning solo instrumental sections.  However, unlike traditional 18th compositions that would be lead by the 1st violins, this piece seems to allow instruments from each family to ‘lead’ the orchestra.  For example the ‘Vivo’ section in the latter half of the ballet gives the leading role to the brass section, which mimics a comical and farcical colour.

The vocal lines written by Stravinsky seemed to be reminiscent of the libretto composed for Gluck’s Orfeo ed Euridice (1762), providing a recitative feel during ‘Mentre l’erbetta’ and the dramatic tones of an aria in ‘Se tu ma’mi’.   There also appears to be distinct polyphonic layers to the more choral sections of ‘Pupillette, fiannette diamore’, giving a rich a deep texture often explored during the ‘development’ section of an 18th century symphony such as Mozart’s Symphony No.6 in F major (1767).  However, scored for Soprano, Tenor and Baritone, the vocal performances are a far cry from the high-pitched tones provided by Gluck’s castrato performers. 

The strong sense of repetition that can be heard within this composition is also typical when listening to pieces from the Classical era.  Throughout different sections Stravinsky has modulated motifs, moving them through a variety of moods and tempo to develop the music’s narrative abilities.   The range of dynamics, which varies greatly between instruments, provides yet another textural element.   However, unlike the subtler use of dynamics in 18th century pieces, such as the second movement of Johan Stamitz Clarinet Concerto in B flat major (1755), Stravinsky has opted to use a very dramatic and tense contrast in dynamics at times.    

However, a contrasting and more modern technique comes in the structure of the piece.  Despite being split into 20 ‘sections’, Pulcinella was designed as a performance of one continuous piece of music (Huscher: n.d.).  This means that the end of each ‘section’, excluding the finale, ends with no form of cadence - often abruptly and sharply.  However, when listened to as one continuous piece, it carries the feel of a single over-arching cadence and sense of resolution. 

Whilst many elements of Pulcinella would not be out of place in 18th century Manheim, I would suggest that it is Stravinsky’s use of slightly more unusual harmonies that brings his composition up-to-date.  For example, during the ‘Allegro – alla breve’ section, the tense and slightly dissonant oscillating effect provided by the strings seems to directly juxtapose the wind’s more gentle and melodic movement.

In contrast to Pulcinella’s, partiallyborrowed’ score, Sergei Prokofiev chose to compose his own neo-Classical material, reminiscent of the earlier works of Haydn.   Prokofiev’s Symphony No. 1 (1917), often referred to as the Classical Symphony, adopts different compositional techniques, yet still remains focused on the ‘revival’ of the Classical school (Kovacs: 2013). 

Carpenter (n.d.) describes how Prokofiev composed the Classical Symphony using traditional scoring methods and a sense of economy, in line with the more classical techniques.   However, he argues that,

“The "Classical" Symphony is not really neo-Classical along the lines of contemporaneous works by Stravinsky, but rather a work of elegant simplicity that evokes the spirit of high Viennese Classicism filtered through the more adventurous sensibilities of Prokofiev's own musical language.”

The overall length of Prokofiev’s symphony, at less than 20 minutes in duration, is comparable to Haydn’s earlier symphonic compositions such as The London Symphony No. 97 in C major (1792), which is just under 30 minutes in length.  In addition, the four movements of Symphony No.1 are based upon the 18th century structural developments of Johann Stamitz and the Manheim School.   This is evident in Prokofiev’s choice to compose an allegro-sonata first movement, a slower more lyrical 2nd section, a distinct dance rhythm in the 3rd section and close with a fast-paced movement. 

Much in keeping with the Classical style, Prokofiev presents a number of musical ideas in the opening movement; each of which are modulated and adapted through different keys to provide textural familiarity.   However, I feel that the sudden and dramatic shifts in tonal centre and dynamics provide a distinctly modern feel to the piece, backed up by the slightly polyphonic and dissonant harmonies. 

Whilst reading the score for Symphony No. 1, it is evident that Prokofiev opted to include a homophonic nature to his composition, reflective of musical practice during the 1700s.   However, much like my findings of Stravinsky’s Pulcinella, I feel that it is the inclusion of more modern harmonic material that underpins and updates the style of Prokofiev’s classical counterparts such as Haydn.    

The mood throughout this piece is in keeping with Haydn’s bright, slightly comical and lighthearted compositions such as Symphony No. 80 (1784).  However, the inclusion of slightly dissonant harmonies offers a more anxious and tense feeling.  In later sections, such as the last movement, it is clear that some of Beethoven’s 19th century ideas of heroism bleed through.  However, despite these changes in moods, the modulation of themes and rhythmic momentum seems to somehow drive the piece forward – linking each section’s themes and ideas.

I feel that the first and last movements of Symphony No. 1 in particular carry a certain sense of melodic narrative seen in earlier works, such the score for Mozart’s Opera The Marriage of Figaro (1786).  In addition, Prokofiev’s ‘nod’ to his earlier counterparts is immediately obvious with his inclusion of the ‘Mannheim Rocket’, a compositional technique developed in 18th Century Manheim, which sees a rapid ascension of the melodic line in the opening bars of the piece (Lindsay: 2011).  However, despite Prokofiev’s classical methodology, the composition makes heavy use of contrast, both in harmony, dynamics and rhythm, which brings a distinctly twentieth century ‘feel’.  This is particularly evident in the ‘Gavotte’ movement, which although based on a dance of the classical period, adopting the traditional A-B-A ternary form, provides a more ‘unstable’ rhythmic property, featuring dramatic and sudden dynamic and tonal changes that greatly vary from the classical mantle.

The ‘classical’ simplicity of Prokofiev’s score seems to be well hidden by the frequent use of repetition, which stands as both a modern and traditional feature.   Echoing and elongating motifs across instruments, for example, passing a melody from flute to oboe to bassoon in succession, Prokofiev offers not only a air of familiarity with the material, but also a delivers a seemingly complex, multi layered sound.   There are also a number of ambiguous cadences which contrast classical techniques.  Excluding the finale, which sees a slight ‘waltz’ rhythm to its powerful cadence, the first, second and third movements seem to provide a sense of anti-climax, perhaps to aid in the fluidity of the entire piece. In addition, the use of trills and quick triplet sections also provide a sense of depth and variation – bringing the past-dated 18th century themes into modern day.

In conclusion, both Prokofiev and Stravinsky demonstrate a distinct fusion of both modern and classical works, but adopt very different methodology.  Whilst Stravinsky opted to gain inspiration from pre-existing material, Prokofiev’s fully original composition, draws significantly on the works of Haydn.   However, similarities can be drawn between their compositional styles.  Both composers seem to have adopted a sense of 18th melody, underpinned by more modern harmonic processes, applying dissonance.  They both use dramatic and sudden changes in timbre, which is more in line with 19th century ideas, and both decided to ‘re-shuffle’ the traditional 18th musical form to suit their needs.

It is Stravinsky and Prokofiev’s exploration of musical form which lead me to question whether both composers, in their pursuit of neo-Classicism, were not only focused on the composition of traditional material, but were trying to emulate the psychological thinking of the Classical ‘school’ of music.    O’Rourke-Jones & Summers (2013) suggest that forms such as the symphony, sonata and concerto were developed with a strong sense of ensuring the music ‘held’ the attention of the audience.   It therefore stands to reason that Stravinsky’s choice to compose shorter versions of their classical counterparts, layered with dissonant textural elements, may have been in an effort to relate to the ever-shortening attention span of modern society.