Below is my brief analysis of Bach’s Fugue No. 2 BWV 847 (1722).
In this, I have tried to identify occurrences of the ‘main theme or
subject’, contrasting subjects and countersubjects. In addition, I will be looking for instances
of augmentations, diminution and other ‘treatments’ that Bach may have
applied.
Whilst studying the score, I was able to instantly notice
that this piece is composed for three voices.
For the purposes of this analysis, I will call them the soprano voice,
the alto voice and the tenor voice. This
is due to their placement on the grand staff and their ranges, which loosely
match those of the vocal parts listed above.
I initially noticed the ‘main subject’, introduced by the
alto voice in bars 1-3 and repeated numerous times throughout the
composition. However, what I found
interesting was that the subject was not necessarily presented as an exact
‘note-for-note replica’, but instead imitated the tonal movement of the
subject, at times transposing and augmenting, but always keeping the same
rhythmic pattern.
In addition, I noticed five or six countersubjects which
appeared throughout the piece, once again respecting the rhythmic patterns of
the countersubject, but not necessarily the tonal. A good example of one of these
‘countersubjects’ begins in the third bar in the alto voice. This begins directly after the alto has
stated the original ‘subject’ and whilst the soprano line is giving an
‘answer’, the countersubject begins, almost as an accompaniment.
Although I have studied Bach’s fugues, looking specifically
at his use of counterpoint, I am always struck by the sheer genius of his fugal
works. The complexity of the fugues are
not to everyone's taste, but when analysed they can be broken down in simple
overlapping ‘parts’, which come together to create a deep, rich texture to the
music.
No comments:
Post a Comment